Bondi

Romero Cardoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202524-2California759 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR ADALBERTO ROMERO No. 24-2 CARDOZA; HELEN ROXANA JORGE Agency Nos.

CALDERON; MATEO SEBASTIAN A220-602-315

ROMERO JORGE, A240-085-759

A240-085-760

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and R. NELSON and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Cesar Adalberto Romero Cardoza (“Petitioner”), 1 a native and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioner’s partner and son are derivative beneficiaries of Petitioner’s primary application. citizen of El Salvador, seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.