Bondi
Romero Cardoza v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202524-2California759 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CESAR ADALBERTO ROMERO No. 24-2 CARDOZA; HELEN ROXANA JORGE Agency Nos.
CALDERON; MATEO SEBASTIAN A220-602-315
ROMERO JORGE, A240-085-759
A240-085-760
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 15, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and R. NELSON and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Cesar Adalberto Romero Cardoza (“Petitioner”), 1 a native and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioner’s partner and son are derivative beneficiaries of Petitioner’s primary application. citizen of El Salvador, seeks…