Nemesio Rodriguez-Patlan v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202517-71616California3,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 30 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEMESIO ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ- No. 17-71616 PATLAN, AKA Nemesio A. Rodriguezpatlan, Agency No. A205-719-889

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 17, 2023 Submission Vacated April 30, 2024 Resubmitted December 10, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, COLLINS, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence by Judge COLLINS.

Petitioner Nemesio Alejandro Rodriguez-Patlan, a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of Petitioner’s application for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the United Nations

Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.