Bondi

Espinoza Gutierrez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202523-3905California334 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-3905

JUAN MANUEL ESPINOZA

GUTIERREZ,

Agency No. Petitioner, A205-466-816

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 23, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, FRIEDLAND, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Juan Manuel Espinoza Gutierrez is a native and citizen of Mexico.

He petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The Court reviews a denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.

Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). “The BIA abuses its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.