Dresser

Dresser v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202523-3092California957 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODERIC J. DRESSER, No. 23-3092

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-05083-MLP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Roderic J. Dresser (“Dresser”) appeals the district court’s order

upholding the denial of his application for social security benefits. We presume

the parties’ familiarity with the facts and discuss them only as necessary for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). context. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.