Doe

Doe v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202523-271California418 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DOE, No. 23-271 Agency No. Securities and Petitioner, Exchange Commission v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities and Exchange Commission

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: BEA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.**

John Doe petitions for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange

Commission (“SEC”) denying his claim for a whistleblower award under Section

21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We have jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. § 78u-6(f), and we deny the petition.

Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.