Furst

Furst v. Mayne

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 202524-2895California1,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT GARY FURST, AKA Robert No. 24-2895 Furst, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01287-DLR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

LINDA MAYNE, AKA Linda Furst Mayne; STEPHEN S. MAYNE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2025 ** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: RAWLINSON, BUMATAY, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BUMATAY.

Robert Furst (Furst) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

partial summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of Linda and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Stephen Mayne. Reviewing de novo, we affirm. See Day v. Henry,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.