Gluck
Gluck v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Opinion
Fujisaki, J.
Filed 5/30/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
ROBERT GLUCK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN A170087
FRANCISCO,
(City & County of San Francisco Defendant and Respondent; Super. Ct. No. CGC-23-609954)
San Francisco has a combined sewer system that collects and treats both wastewater and stormwater in the same network. (City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency (2025) 604 U.S. ___ [145 S.Ct. 704, 707] (Environmental Protection Agency) [detailing combined system]; Edward Brown & Sons v. City and County of San Francisco (1950) 36 Cal.2d 272, 274 (Edward Brown & Sons) [describing “combined storm and sanitary sewers”].) In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, also known as the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act.” (Ballot Pamp., Gen. Elec. (Nov. 5, 1996) text of Prop. 218, § 1, p. 108.) Proposition 218 added certain provisions to the California Constitution for property-related charges imposed by local government. (Ballot Pamp., § 4, pp. 108–109.) These provisions included (1) a voter approval requirement for the…