Harris

Harris v. Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20251:21-cv-00882California8,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 F. Russell Harris, et al., 1:21-cv-00882-KJM-EPG 1] Plaintiffs, ORDER 12 v. 13 Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131, et al., Defendants. 16 F. Russell Harris and Harris Farms, LP (collectively Harris) allege Henry Miller Reclamation District No. 2131 CHMRD), San Luis Canal Company (SLCC) and James Nickel, Cannon Michael, David Pruitt, Robert McDonald, Douglas Goodman, David Carlucci, and Michael Palazzo, in both their personal capacities and official capacities as members of the board of directors for SLCC, and John Wiersma, in both his personal capacity and his official capacity as general manager of SLCC, violated Harris’s constitutional rights when defendants’ denied his 23 application for licenses to build a new water collection and distribution system Harris believed was necessary to sustain his newly planted almond trees.! Two motions are currently before the ' Nickel is a member of the board of trustees of HMRD and is the board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.