Arisco

(PC) Loftis v. Arisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20251:22-cv-01266California3,083 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARQUISE DEANGELO LOFTIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01266-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. (ECF No. 47) ARISCO, et al., ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE

RESPONSE REGARDING READINESS FOR

Defendants. TRIAL OR MOTION TO MODIFY

SCHEDULING ORDER TO RESET

DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 17 I. Procedural History Plaintiff Marquise DeAngelo Loftis (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Rosales Murillo,1 Tienda, Diaz, and Navarro (collectively, “Defendants”) for excessive force/failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment (claim 2, for duration and use of triangle in cuffing); (2) Defendants Tienda and Diaz for excessive force…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.