Dailey-Henry

I. INTRODUCTION

17 Plaintiff Alvera Dailey-Henry filed this case, on March 21, 2024, (Doc. 1), and now proceeds pro se, (see Doc. 14). On April 25, 2025—after attempting to contact Plaintiff no less than three times regarding her failure to respond to discovery requests, (see Doc. 17-3 ¶¶ 10–14, see also Docs. 17-6, 17-7, 17-8))—Defendant filed two motions to compel Plaintiff’s responses to written discovery and appearance at a deposition. (Docs. 16, 17). Plaintiff did not timely respond. On May 14, 2025, an order issued for Plaintiff to show cause (“OSC”) and to respond by May 26, 2025. (See Doc. 19). The OSC expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s order would “be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions, up to an including a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.” (Id. at 2). Plaintiff has not yet filed any response, and the time to do so has passed. II. ANALYSIS The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to…