(PC) Davis v. Clark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN DWAYNE DAVIS, No. 1:25-cv-00229-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION KEN CLARK, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
ACTION Defendants. (ECF Nos. 8, 9) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on February 21, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On March 26, 2025, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the March 26, 2025 order. Therefore, on May 5, 2025, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action…