Prieto

Prieto v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20251:25-cv-00619California2,969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR MARTI PRIETO, No. 1:25-cv-00619 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER: DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE

v. SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR: JOHN DOE, et al., (1) FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES, AND

Defendants. (2) UNTIMELINESS

ORDER: ALTERNATIVELY GIVING

PLAINTIFF OPPORTUNITY TO

VOLUNTARILY DISMISS THIS ACTION

PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE OR, IN

THE ALTERNATIVE, HIS VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF THIS MATTER DUE IN

FOURTEEN DAYS 21 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2 (complaint, application to proceed in forma pauperis). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.