Hicks

(PC) Rollen v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20252:24-cv-01303California755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VAN KEYSHONE ROLLEN, No. 2:24-cv-01303-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. HICKS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Van Keyshone Rollen (“Plaintiff”) filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. By findings and recommendations filed January 3, 2025, the magistrate judge recommended that the First Amended Complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend and gave Plaintiff twenty-one days to file objections. (ECF No. 25.) The deadline to file objections was later extended at Plaintiff’s request (ECF Nos. 26, 27), but Plaintiff failed to file timely objections. The findings and recommendations were adopted in full by this Court on April 18, 2025. (ECF No. 28.) Pursuant to the Court’s April 18, 2025 Order, this action was dismissed, the case was closed, and judgment was entered the same day. (ECF Nos. 28, 29.) On May 14, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.