(PC) Adams v. Solano State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20252:24-cv-02802California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY ADAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-2802-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against defendants Solano State Prison, Warden Jason Schultz, C. Pangelinan, Abstrak, Tibbado, and Drenias. The specifics of his claims are difficult to understand, but he appears to allege that his rights were violated because defendants changed the way his good-time credits were calculated to his detriment. This claim, as articulated, is non- cognizable. I will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend and give plaintiff an opportunity to remedy this deficiency. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable 28 claims and dismiss any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.