(PS) Beliaev v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20252:25-cv-01046California970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK BELIAEV, Case No. 2:25-cv-1046-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS U.S. IMMIGRANTION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Mark Beliaev (“plaintiff”) alleges that defendants United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and Smith, an officer with the ICE field office in Fresno, violated his rights by denying his immigration parole and forcing him to wear a GPS bracelet. ECF No. 9 at 1-2. As I explained in my previous screening order, these claims are non-cognizable. I now recommend that this action be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.