(PS) Nguyen v. ITAY SNDF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAN NGUYEN, No. 2:25-cv-01408-DJC-SCR Plaintiff, ITAY SNOF1, et al. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) will therefore be granted. However, for the reasons provided below, the Court finds Plaintiff’s complaint does not state a claim and fails to set forth a basis for federal jurisdiction. The Court recommends this action be dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff has additionally filed eleven other motions, including five motions for temporary restraining order, which are addressed herein. //// //// 27 Plaintiff’s handwriting is sometimes difficult to read and the…