Craven

Craven v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20253:20-cv-01933California7,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KALVIN N. CRAVEN, Case No. 20-cv-01933-SI (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING HABEAS RELIEF

FOR REMAINING SIXTH

v. AMENDMENT CLAIM

JANAN CAVAGNOLO, Acting Warden,

Respondent.

12 Kalvin N. Craven, a state prisoner incarcerated at California State Prison-Solano, filed a pro se action for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to challenge his conviction from Alameda County Superior Court for multiple convictions of second-degree robbery with firearm- use enhancements. On December 12, 2024, the Court issued its denial of claims in his original petition and Second Amended Petition (“SAP”), and it subsequently entered judgment. Dkt. Nos. 80, 81. Thereafter, Craven filed a motion for relief from the judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b), stating that the Court “committed clear error during its analysis of the issue [he] raised in Claim 2.” Dkt. No. 82 at 1. Specifically, Craven argued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.