Yuan
Yuan v. Eightfold AI Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TANGGANG “DAN” YUAN, Case No. 24-cv-04238-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
EIGHTFOLD AI INC., Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Defendant Eightfold AI’s (“Eightfold”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Tanggang “Dan” Yuan’s Massachusetts state law claims for failure to state a claim. ECF 74. Because the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument, the Court VACATES the hearing set for June 5, 2025. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. Having carefully considered the parties’ papers and the arguments therein, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Eightfold’s motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND In November 2021, Yuan accepted a contracted job offer from Eightfold, a company with its principal place of business in California, and began work eleven days later. Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) (ECF 71) ¶¶ 2, 6. At the time he was hired and at all times he…