Reybol
Reybol v. Treasury Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Case No. 25-cv-02413-JSC
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL ORDER
v.
TREASURY DEPARTMENT, Defendant.
12 On March 10, 2025, Arcelio Joseph Reybol—proceeding without attorney representation—sued the Treasury Department. (Dkt. No. 1.) That same day, Mr. Reybol moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 2.) On March 12, 2025, the Court denied without prejudice Mr. Reybol’s application to proceed IFP. (Dkt. No. 4.) That order provided Plaintiff through April 9, 2025 to file another IFP application. On April 18, 2025, the Court denied Mr. Reybol’s request to proceed IFP because “the April 9, 2025 deadline ha[d] passed and Mr. Reybol ha[d] not filed another IFP application.” (Dkt. No. 5.) That order stated “[i]f Mr. Reybol does not pay the filing fee by May 19, 2025, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice.” As of the date of this order, Mr. Reybol has not paid the filing fee. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…