Al-Mansur

Al-Mansur v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20253:24-cv-06909California2,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SABIR AL-MANSUR, Case No. 24-cv-06909-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. RECUSE OR DISQUALIFY

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 119, 123, 129 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff Sabir Al-Mansur’s several motions seeking judicial recusal. The motions are fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7- 1(b), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES Al-Mansur’s motions for the following reasons. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Al-Mansur brought this lawsuit against the County of Alameda, California, and several of its officers alleging constitutional takings, violation of due process, fraud, and other claims arising from a property tax bill. See generally Compl. (ECF 1). After the Court denied Al-Mansur’s motion for preliminary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.