Al-Mansur
Al-Mansur v. County of Alameda
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SABIR AL-MANSUR, Case No. 24-cv-06909-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
v. FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 87, 102 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is a motion for compensatory attorney’s fees from Defendants County of Alameda, Henry C. Levy, Theody Virrey, and Shahidah J. Williams. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND This case relates to Plaintiff Sabir Al-Mansur’s ownership of real property located at 2421 Market Street, Oakland, CA 94607. Compl. (ECF 1) ¶ 19. Al-Mansur challenged the County of Alameda’s imposition of property taxes and late…