Mueller

Mueller v. Ackley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202524-1270California896 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES MUELLER, No. 24-1270 D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00785-MK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ZACK ACKLEY, Superintendent DRCI; Ms. CARTER, DRCI Health Services Manager; Doctor LELAND P. BEAMER; Ms. MACK, Officer; Mr. STOUT, Officer; Sgt. FRENCH; JOHN DOE JANE DOE, Health Services TLC Committee Members,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mustafa T. Kasubhai, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 21, 2025***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Former Oregon state prisoner Christopher Charles Mueller…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.