Bondi

Rojas Ruiz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202524-2398California618 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YAMIL ALEXANDER ROJAS No. 24-2398

RUIZ; LESLIE ELENA RUFFASTO

LIVIA; YARED YAMIL ROJAS Agency Nos.

RUFFASTO, A240-915-212

A240-915-213

Petitioners, A240-915-214

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 16, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,*** District Judge.

Yamil Alexander Rojas Ruiz and members of his family (collectively,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David Alan Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. Petitioners) petition for review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.