Le

Le v. Prestige Community Credit Union

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 202524-674California881 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TU LE, an individual, on behalf of No. 24-674 themselves and a class of all others similarly D.C. No. situated; GENEVA NGUYEN, an 8:22-cv-00259-JVS-KES individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated; MAI T. LY, an individual, on behalf of themselves MEMORANDUM* and a class of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

PRESTIGE COMMUNITY CREDIT

UNION, a national credit union; DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

The plaintiffs here were unfortunate victims of a Ponzi scheme. They now

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. seek recovery from Prestige Community Credit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.