Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20253:20-cv-04688California4,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04688-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIES’

GOOGLE LLC, DAUBERT MOTIONS

13 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION In this class action litigation over data privacy, Plaintiffs and Defendant Google LLC move under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) to exclude various aspects of expert testimony each side has put forth ahead of trial. For the reasons explained below, the motions are granted in part and denied in part. II. BACKGROUND The facts of this case have been discussed at length in prior orders in this litigation. See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Google LLC, No. 20-cv-04688-RS, 2025 WL 50425, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2025). In short, Plaintiffs are a group of mobile device users who had certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.