Frank Dominguez v. County of Los Angeles California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20252:23-cv-10523California1,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTE S – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-10523-CAS (SK) Date: June 2, 2025 Title Frank Dominguez, et al. v. County of Los Angeles California, et al.

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s): None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiffs Frank Dominguez and Elyse Selvage, proceeding in forma pauperis and pro se, have named the County of Los Angeles and at least ten County officials in a civil suit nominally under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF 35). Defendants have moved to dismiss the operative Second Amended Complaint (SAC) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. (ECF 38). After several requested extensions, plaintiffs opposed the motion to dismiss on the merits but alternatively asked for leave to file another amended complaint to cure (if possible) any claims otherwise subject to dismissal for the reasons detailed in defendants’ motion. (ECF 43 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.