Quesenberry

Quesenberry v. RSE Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20253:23-cv-05020California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRYAN QUESENBERRY, Case No. 23-cv-05020-TSH

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: GOVERNMENT'S v. NOTICE OF ELECTION TO DECLINE

INTERVENTION

RSE CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Bryan Quesenberry brings this complaint on behalf of the United States of America under the False Claims Act (FCA). The government has now filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention. ECF No. 16. “The FCA authorizes a private person, known as a relator, to bring a qui tam civil action ‘for a violation of section 3729 for the person and for the United States Government . . . in the name of the Government.’” Stoner v. Santa Clara Cnty. Office of Educ., 502 F.3d 1116, 1119 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1)). “[T]he entire purpose of the FCA’s qui tam provisions is to employ the help of individuals to uncover fraud against the government.” Id. at 1126 (quoting United States ex rel. Kelly v. Boeing Co., 9 F.3d 743,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.