Obillo

Obillo v. i-Health Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20253:24-cv-02459California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 MALIA OBILLO, Case No. 24-cv-02459-PHK Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

v. CLOSE CASE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF I-HEALTH INC., CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. Re: Dkt.

13 The Court has reviewed the Parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, wherein the Parties jointly stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's individual claims and to the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff's putative class claims. [Dkt. 48]. The Stipulation is self- effectuating pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because no class has been certified in this case, and because any dismissal would not affect putative class members' claims, Rule 23(e) does not mandate either Court approval of the Parties' settlement or notice to putative class members. See Titus v. BlueChip Financial, 786 F. App'x 694, 695 (9th Cir. 2019)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.