Barba

(PC) Reid v. Barba

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20251:22-cv-00344California931 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLTON L. REID, Case No. 1:22-cv-00344-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. Doc. 12 JASON BARBA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Carlton L. Reid is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 8. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. After screening, plaintiff elected to stand on his first amended complaint subject to the assigned magistrate judge’s recommendations regarding claims deemed not cognizable. See Docs. 9, 10. On January 23, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the action proceed only on plaintiff’s claim against defendant Barba for interference with his First Amendment right to access the courts in connection with his state court habeas corpus petition. Doc. 12. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.