1 2

3

4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 10 ERROL JOSEPH SCORZA, IV, Case No. 2:24-cv-11221-PA-SSC 11 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING

12 v. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

13 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

UNITED STATES

14 GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

15 CALIFORNIA, et al.,

APPEALABILITY

16 Respondents. 17

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 the Court has reviewed the petition, 19 all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United 20 States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. The Court 21 accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the 22 Report and Recommendation. 23 IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action 24 without prejudice to refiling if authorized by the Ninth Circuit. 25 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a 26 substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the 27 1 | appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); 2 | Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2008); 3 | Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). ht C4 5 | DATED: June 2, 2025 6 PERCY ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28