Zajonc

Zajonc v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20253:25-cv-02860California1,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAULA ZAJONC, Case No. 3:25-cv-02860-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. AND STRIKE

T-MOBILE US, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant.

12 Paula Zajonc filed this putative class action in Alameda County Superior Court challenging Defendant T-Mobile’s denial of a religious exemption to its Covid-19 vaccine requirement. Plaintiff brings claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(a); California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Cal. Bus. & Professions Code § 17200; and for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Defendant removed the action to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction and moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 8.) After carefully considering the arguments and briefing submitted, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the June 5, 2025 hearing, and GRANTS Defendant’s motion with leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.