Elliot McGucken v. Substanbo Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20252:25-cv-01053California317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-01053-AS Date June 2, 2025 Title Elliot McGucken v. Substanbo Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge Alma Felix N/A Deputy Clerk Court Smart / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF

PROSECUTION

On February 6, 2025, Plaintiff Elliot McGucken (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Substanbo Inc. and DOES 1–10. (Dkt. No. 1). On February 7, 2025, the Clerk issued a summons as to Defendant Substanbo Inc. (“Substanbo”). (Dkt. No. 7). Plaintiff filed a proof of service reflecting that he served Substanbo on March 14, 2025. (Dkt. No. 8). Substanbo’s answer was therefore due on April 4, 2025. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). To date, Substanbo has not answered the complaint. Plaintiff has declined to further prosecute his action, however, including by filing a request for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) or notice of voluntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.