Tracy Shaw v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20252:25-cv-03035California1,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

On September 4, 2024, Plaintiff filed this slip and fall action against Costco in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. # 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). Plaintiff asserted claims of general negligence and premises liability against Costco as well as unnamed store managers (DOE defendants 1 through 50). Id. at 11. Costco removed the case to the Central District of California on April 7, 2025. Dkt. # 1 (“NOR”). Costco asserted that complete diversity exists between the parties, specifically between Plaintiff and Costco. Id. On May 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand. Mot. Costco failed to timely oppose.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-03035 MWC (MARx) Date: June 2, 2025 Title Tracy Shaw v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al.

II. Legal Standard

“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, possessing only that power authorized by Constitution and statute.” Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251, 256 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, a defendant may remove a civil action from state court to federal district court only if the federal court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case. See City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.