Verizon

Miguel Hernandez v. Verizon

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20252:25-cv-04917California819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-04917-JLS-PVC Date: June 02, 2025 Title: Miguel Hernandez v. Verizon et al

Present: HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Kelly Davis N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Act, a claim under California’s Disabled Persons Act, a claim under California’s Health & Safety Code, and a claim for negligence. (Compl., Doc. 1.) The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, California Health & Safety Code, and negligence claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). “In 2012, in an attempt to deter baseless claims and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.