Greathouse
Greathouse v. City of Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES GREATHOUSE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00715-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
v. (Doc. 15) CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff James Greathouse is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 10, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and granted him a final opportunity to amend his complaint. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed on February 21, 2025, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 15.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief…