Edmond Carmona v. Dominos Pizza LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20258:20-cv-01905California6,320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDMOND CARMONA, ABRAHAM CA SE NO. 8:20-cv-01905-JVS-JDE MENDOZA, ROGER NOGUEIRA, THOMAS ARRIOLA, BURNETT Hon. John. D. Early BRULEE, GYGORY DIAZ, DANIEL

ETCHEPARE, RAUL QUIROZ, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

on behalf of themselves and all others ORDER similarly situated, and all other aggrieved employees,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DOMINO’S PIZZA, LLC, a Michigan Corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 18 Defendant.

Based on the Stipulation (Dkt. 53) by and between Plaintiffs Edmond Carmona, Abraham Mendoza, Roger Nogueira, Thomas Arriola, Burnett Brulee, Gygory Diaz, Daniel Etchepare, and Raul Quiroz (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Domino’s Pizza LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), and for good cause shown, the Court finds and orders as follows. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.