Delgadillo

Delgadillo v. Fresno Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20251:25-cv-00642California3,495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAMUEL DELGADILLO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00642-KES-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. (Doc. 1) FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 14 Plaintiff Samuel Delgadillo, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint on May 29, 2025. (Doc. 1.) Upon reviewing the complaint, the undersigned concludes that it fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. He may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating that he wants to stand on this complaint and have it reviewed by the presiding district judge, in which case the undersigned will issue findings and recommendations to the district judge consistent with this order. If Plaintiff does not file anything, the undersigned will recommend that the case be dismissed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.