(PS) Ali v. San Francisco Asylum Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOHAMEDSALEEM MUBARAK ALI, No. 2:24-cv-0654 DJC AC PS
PARVEEN BANU MOHAMMED BABU,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
SAN FRANCISCO ASYLUM OFFICE
and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE,
16 Defendants.
18 Plaintiffs proceed in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On March 31, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and 21 Recommendations recommending dismissal for failure to prosecute for failure to 22 effectuate service. ECF No. 19. In light of Plaintiffs’ representation in their objections 23 to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 20) that Plaintiffs did not receive the 24 Magistrate Judge’s March 18, 2025 Order (ECF No. 17) with sufficient time to comply, 25 the Court permitted Plaintiffs an additional 21 days to comply with the March 18, 2025 26 Order, through and including May 27, 2025 (ECF No. 22). The Court noted that failure 27 to comply with that Order would result in the matter…