(PS) Arnold v. Lion's Club International Assoc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20252:24-cv-02095California1,483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBLY ARNOLD AND ROLAND No. 2:24-cv-02095 DAD AC (PS)

DUNHAM II,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LIONS CLUB INT’L ASSOC., et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial purposes by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS Plaintiff Kimbly Arnold filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Arnold’s motion was previously granted. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff Roland Dunham II has now also submitted a request to proceed IFP. ECF No. 9. The court GRANTS Mr. Dunham’s motion. Plaintiffs have submitted a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 8. The FAC is now before the court for the screening process that accompanies IFP status. //// //// II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.