(PS) Flynn v. County of Tuolumne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN FLYNN, Case No. 2:24-cv-2265-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 26, 2025, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied since it failed to demonstrate that plaintiff had insufficient assets to pay the filing fee and provide the necessities of life. ECF No. 7. On April 21, 2025, the district judge adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to tender the filing fee within twenty-one days. ECF No. 4. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the filing fee. Plaintiff has, however, filed a motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 8 at 4. Therein, he argues that his financial situation has changed because he recently purchased an automobile. Id. at 4. Critically, he has filed an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that demonstrates that he is unable to pay the…