Rahbarian
Rahbarian v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAIMAN RAHBARIAN and VERA No. 2:24-cv-02270-TLN-SCR
DAVYDENKO,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY;
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA; and DOES 1 to 25, inclusive, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Paiman Rahbarian and Vera Davydenko’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 4.) Defendants Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate Insurance”) and Allstate Insurance Company of California (“AICCA”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 14.) Also before the Court is AICCA’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition. (ECF No. 11.) AICCA filed a reply. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is DENIED and AICCA’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege they entered into a written…