Andes

(HC) Lee v. Andes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20252:24-cv-03684California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN LEE, No. 2:24-cv-3684-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CHANCE ANDES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Darren Lee, a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and paid the filing fee. On April 16, 2025, the undersigned screened the petition and dismissed the petition with leave to amend because it failed to comply with Rule 2(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases.1 (ECF No. 6 at 1.) Petitioner was granted 30 days to file an amended petition and was specifically cautioned that failure to respond to the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The time granted for petitioner to file an amended petition has expired and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.