Holmes
(PC) Calderon v. Holmes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, Case No. 2:25-cv-1446-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
B. HOLMES, et al.,
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2, and a request for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3. However, plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Caldreon v. Covello, No. 2:24- cv-1309-DJC-CKD (E.D. Cal. September 4, 2024) (recognizing plaintiff as a “three-striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). The court takes judicial notice of the following cases constituting strikes: (1) Calderon v. Bonta, 2:23-cv-0212-KJM-EFB (P), dismissed March 26, 2024; (2) Calderon v. Bonta, 2:23-cv- 1065-DJC-DMC (P), dismissed February 15, 2024; (3) Calderon v. Covello, 2:23-cv-1974-DJC- DB (P), dismissed April 1, 2024. A “three-striker” plaintiff may be afforded an opportunity to proceed…