Montejano

United States v. Montejano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-1649California474 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1649 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:19-cr-00455-PSG-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANTONIO RANGEL MONTEJANO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 21, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Antonio Rangel Montejano appeals from the district court’s

denial of his motion for a new trial, which was based on a violation of the Jury

Selection and Service Act of 1968 (“JSSA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1861–1878. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. We review de novo questions of statutory interpretation. Barahona v.

Union Pac. R.R. Co., 881 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir. 2018). Defendant’s claim

under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.