Montejano
United States v. Montejano
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1649 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:19-cr-00455-PSG-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANTONIO RANGEL MONTEJANO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 21, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Antonio Rangel Montejano appeals from the district court’s
denial of his motion for a new trial, which was based on a violation of the Jury
Selection and Service Act of 1968 (“JSSA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1861–1878. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. We review de novo questions of statutory interpretation. Barahona v.
Union Pac. R.R. Co., 881 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir. 2018). Defendant’s claim
under 28 U.S.C. §…