Dong

Dong v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202521-293California424 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHIYONG DONG, No. 21-293 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-555-466 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Zhiyong Dong, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying Dong’s motion to reopen his in absentia

removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.