Comier
Comier v. Mattos
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-1926California551 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEE R. COMIER, Jr., No. 24-1926
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
JOHN MATTOS,
Respondent.
Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Argued and Submitted May 20, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Lee R. Comier, Jr. requests leave to file a second or successive petition for
writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 2244 and deny Comier’s application.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A), a petitioner may not bring second or
successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus unless “the applicant shows that the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on
collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.”
(Emphasis added).