Comier

Comier v. Mattos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-1926California551 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEE R. COMIER, Jr., No. 24-1926

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JOHN MATTOS,

Respondent.

Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Argued and Submitted May 20, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Lee R. Comier, Jr. requests leave to file a second or successive petition for

writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 2244 and deny Comier’s application.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A), a petitioner may not bring second or

successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus unless “the applicant shows that the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on

collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.”

(Emphasis added).

Comier’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.