Yancey

United States v. Yancey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-3328California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3328 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:17-cr-00380-MC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES YANCEY IV,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Charles Yancey IV appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 30-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of his probation. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Yancey argues that the district court procedurally erred by improperly

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). terminating his allocution and preventing him from presenting mitigating

arguments. He further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.