Yancey
United States v. Yancey
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3328 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:17-cr-00380-MC-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHARLES YANCEY IV,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Charles Yancey IV appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 30-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of his probation. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Yancey argues that the district court procedurally erred by improperly
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). terminating his allocution and preventing him from presenting mitigating
arguments. He further…