Brown

United States v. Brown

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-6107California372 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6107 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-00467-JSW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

AARON PIERRE BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Pierre Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 14-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Brown contends that the district court procedurally erred and imposed a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). substantively unreasonable sentence because it failed to consider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.