Bondi

Arteaga Daza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-5301California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS ARTEAGA DAZA; et al., No. 24-5301 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-854-239

A240-854-240

v.

A240-854-241

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Arteaga Daza, Claudia Patricia Ospina Ciro, and their child,

natives and citizens of Colombia, petition pro se for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,

791 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.