Acevedo-Rivera

Acevedo-Rivera v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 202524-4671California485 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DORA ACEVEDO-RIVERA; et al., No. 24-4671 Petitioners, Agency Nos.

A202-077-834

v. A202-077-835

A202-077-836

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

A202-077-837

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Dora Acevedo-Rivera and her children, natives and citizens of El Salvador,

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, and de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.